Yup Traditional stick and string is its own animal and requires daily practice as it is a highly perishable skill and requires the highest of ethical standards. I enjoy hunting with one of my recurves or longbows very much. Theres just something about it that is almost unexplainable.Rather see some folks with a crossbow than struggling and wounding deer with a compound. I still hunt with 1960's recurves and wood arrows I fletch myself at age 65; but I get in close and pass on a LOT of iffy shots and practice all year. You can't just pick up a bow on opening day and then mothball it for 11 months.
Agreed. Just because a crossbow scope shows hash mark up to a 100 doesn't mean you should shoot that far. Today's crossbows are a different animal than 12 years ago. Speed being the major improvement. With that speed comes the noise. At 60 yds, a deer has time to jump the string on even the fastest crossbow. I am sure more than a few people leaned that with a stick bow and a compound. It's the same as it was back in the day as compounds increased their speed. Guys thought they could shoot a deer at 50 yds. Myself, never shot over 32yds and the majority are under 20 yds with the closest being 8ft.I tried a crossbow about 12 yrs ago. I didn't like it. Big and clumsy in a treestand. I also wasn't overly impressed with the range. I just hope people don't over estimate the range and power of a crossbow. It should allow people to be more accurate at typical bow ranges. Out to say 40 yds. But it's not a rifle and requires PRACTICE like anything else. I'm kinda neutral on the new law. But if it helps someone get in the woods who otherwise couldn't. It's probably a good thing.